The SRRS collects information on stressful life events in the past year. Convergent validity states that tests having the same or similar constructs should be highly correlated. This video covers material from Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences (4th edition) by Gravetter and Forzano. As far as I could see they both increase the validity of research by showing that related variables or constructs are related to their research. The Simple Lifestyle Indicator Questionnaire (SLIQ) remains the only short, easy-to-use instrument available for measuring cardiovascular lifestyle as a single construct. Subsequently two further blocks of 100 people per age group were contacted until we had sufficient sample size. intelligence) is actually measuring that construct. Some other types of validity are: Composite, Concurrent, Convergent, Consequential, Curricular and Instructional, Ecological, External, Face, Formative validity & Summative Validity, Incremental Validity, Internal, Predictive, Sampling, and Statistical Conclusion Validity. I’ve never heard of “translation” validity before, but I needed a good name to summarize what both face and content validity are getting at, and that one seemed sensible. Convergent Validity. As the name suggests, concurrent validity relies upon tests that took place at the same time. The practices have electronic medical records (EMRs). People with a score of 5 out of 8 or higher had a 5 times higher likelihood of dying within 5 years. Convergent validity is a subcategory of construct validity. Convergent validity and discriminant validity are never all-or-nothing constructs, and thus it is never possible to defi nitively “prove” the construct validity of a measured variable. This was the motive behind the development of the SLIQ. An There are two forms of criterion-related validity: predictive validity and concurrent validity. , and people who score 5 or higher on the eight-question scale had a mean SLIQ score of 7.2 (SD 1.4) while those who scored less than 5 on the eight questions scale had a mean SLIQ score of 5.8 (SD 1.8); these two means were from statistically different populations, In convergent validity, we examine the degree to which the operationalization is similar to (converges on) other operationalizations that it theoretically should be similar to. eaten on a weekly basis over the previous year. Both convergent and concurrent validity are ways of assessing construct validity by examining the strength of the relationship between the scores from two different measurement procedures. ", "Convergent validity refers to the degree to which scores on a test correlate with (or are related to) scores on other tests that are designed to assess the same construct. If the scores for each employee on both tests are closely related, then the new scale is said to have high concurrent validity." Sorry if this isn't the right place to post this but I can't think of any other subreddit . However, the SLIQ measures the person’s assessment of their current stress level while the SRRS simply scores stress events in a person’s life over the previous year. The categorization of individuals as unhealthy/intermediate/healthy was assessed to determine if these three groups were from separate populations; that is, whether the mean and standard deviations of the SLIQ scores in these three groups were separated such that there was very little overlap. Each component is assigned a category score of 0, 1, or 2, based on raw scoring of questions related to each component. If the scores for each employee on both tests are closely related, then the new scale is said to have high concurrent validity. However, whilst concurrent validity compared a new measurement procedure with a well-established measurement procedure, both measurement procedures are new when testing for convergent validity. Marshall Godwin, Andrea Pike, Cheri Bethune, Allison Kirby, Adam Pike, "Concurrent and Convergent Validity of the Simple Lifestyle Indicator Questionnaire", International Scholarly Research Notices, vol. In this current study, validity was assessed by determining the correlation coefficients between the component raw scores on the SLIQ and the appropriate reference standards (DHQ, SRRS, Question 1 on the SF36, and step per day on the pedometer). Is there anyone that could explain it and provide some examples?? Details of education, marital status, income, and BMI are shown in Table 1. I'm studying for a psych research final right now, and I've been trying to understand and differentiate Concurrent Validity and Convergent Validity! The only Convergent/ Concurrent validity findings available for the ILP must be derived from regression analyses conducted by Pulford and Sohal (2006). To establish convergent validity, you need to show that measures that should be related are in reality related. Randomly generated lists of patients in three age groups, 40–59 years, 60–79 years, and 80+ years, were compiled by the clinic staff. We recruited patients aged 40 and above from three different family physician clinics that are part of a practice-based research network and have participated in research studies previously. ). Such a metric should also provide a test of the statistical significance of the match between observed and expected correlations, and provide confidence intervals for that match, taking into account the like-lihood that some of the validating variables may not be indepen-dent of one another. hide. Convergent validity applies greatly in medicine, education, psychology, and social science. For instance, Item 1 might be the statement “I feel good about myself” rated using a 1-to-5 Likert-type response format. The two measures may be for the same construct, or for different, but presumably related, constructs. Using an alpha of 0.05 and a beta of 0.2, we calculated that 153 participants would be needed to make sure that a correlation of 0.2 or more was statistically different from a correlation of zero. A common denominator which most validity concepts share in contradis-tinction to reliability is that this agreement represent the convergence of independent approaches. The concurrent validities between the test and other measures of the same domain are correlational measures of convergent validity. Convergent/Concurrent. It also collects detailed information on alcohol consumption [11, 12]. Construct validity’s main idea is that a test used to measure a construct is, in fact, measuring a construct. If they don’t, the questions might not be valid. This is despite use of the most conservative estimate—the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval for the Pearson Coefficient. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. On the bottom part of the figure (Observation) w… This re-quirement is evidence of convergent validity. Concurrent validity is a type of evidence that can be gathered to defend the use of a test for predicting other outcomes. In order to estimate this type of validity, test-makers administer the test and correlate it with the criteria. The concurrent validities between the test and other measures of the same domain are correlational measures of convergent validity. share. Cost was one issue for us in this regard. A French version is also available, but none of the psychometric testing has been carried out in French. This study provides further psychometrics on the Simple Lifestyle Indicator Questionnaire (SLIQ), a short, easy-to-use instrument which measures all these lifestyle characteristics as a single construct. One hundred and ninety-three individuals from St. John’s, Newfoundland, and Labrador, Canada completed the SLIQ and reference standards for diet, exercise, stress, and alcohol consumption. One hundred and ninety-three individuals from St. John’s, Newfoundland, and Labrador, Canada completed the SLIQ and r… In 2010, with funding through the Healthy Aging Research Program of the Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research, we conducted further validity testing. Question 1 asks “In general, would you say your health is □ Excellent □ Very Good □ Good □ Fair □ Poor.”. ex. ), SLIQ versus alcohol consumption ( of zero indicates no correlation and an Sorry if this isn't the right place to post this but I can't think of any other subreddit. There are two forms of criterion-related validity: predictive validity and concurrent validity. , Physical activity score was compared with number of steps on a pedometer. We used ANOVA to determine the mean and standard deviations and 95% CI for these groups. Revised on June 19, 2020. The reference standards were a detailed Diet History Questionnaire (DHQ), the Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS), the SF36 Health Status Questionnaire, and a survey of eight questions from a cardiovascular risk questionnaire. Convergent validity is measured by comparing the instrument in question with another instrument that measures a related, but different, construct. Press J to jump to the feed. Convergent validity takes two measures that are supposed to be measuring the same construct and shows that they are related. Convergent validity occurs where measures of constructs that are expected to correlate do so. Criterion validity A measurement technique has criterion validity if its results are closely related to those given by Convergent validity, a parameter often used in sociology, psychology, and other behavioral sciences, refers to the degree to which two measures of constructs that theoretically should be related, are in fact related. I'm studying for a psych research final right now, and I've been trying to understand and differentiate Concurrent Validity and Convergent Validity! If they don’t, the questions might not be valid. Second, a validity diagonal value should be higher than the val-ues lying in its column and row in the heterotrait-heteromethod triangles. This study provides further psychometrics on the Simple Lifestyle Indicator Questionnaire (SLIQ), a short, easy-to-use instrument which measures all these lifestyle characteristics as a single construct. In the figure below, we see four measures (each is an item on a scale) that all purport to reflect the construct of self esteem. The overall SLIQ lifestyle score correlated reasonable well with the eight-question risk scale This paper reports on the concurrent validity of the physical activity, diet, alcohol, and stress components of the SLIQ. The absolute value of the correlation for the stress component is the lowest of all the components, and we considered dropping it from the scale. Opinion on how a given level of correlation between 0 and 1 should be interpreted varies in the literature. There was still a need to further assess the validity of the individual components. Question 1 on the SF36 is used as a measure of self-assessed health status [15–18]. It has been suggested that we should have used an accelerometer to measure actual physical activity rather than a pedometer. The higher the score the higher the likelihood of experiencing stress [13, 14]. Construct Validity: Convergent vs. Discriminant. Concurrent vs. Predictive Validity. Two methods are often applied to test convergent validity. None of the differences in convergent and concurrent validity between the BBS and DGI were significant. Validity Convergent/Concurrent. 2.0 for convergent validity, look at factor loading. Convergent validity video that explains the definition in a dynamic and interactive way. In 2005, Spencer et al. Nilsson, and G. Berglund, “Chronic psychosocial stress predicts long-term cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in middle-aged men,”, D. Mozaffarian, P. W. F. Wilson, and W. B. Kannel, “Beyond established and novel risk factors lifestyle risk factors for cardiovascular disease,”, M. Godwin, S. Streight, E. Dyachuk et al., “Testing the simple lifestyle indicator questionnaire: initial psychometric study,”, T. H. Holmes and R. H. Rahe, “The social readjustment rating scale,”, M. Horowitz, C. Schaefer, and D. Hiroto, “Life event questionnaires for measuring presumptive stress,”, C. A. McHorney, J. E. Ware Jr., and A. E. Raczek, “The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. As far as I could see they both increase the validity of research by showing that related variables or constructs are related to their research. While lifestyle and health status are related, they would not be expected to have high correlation since a change in one may precede or follow the other rather than necessarily exist concurrently. If the item loads high (preferably > .5) on its parent factor WITH low cross loading (< .32) on the other, then you can assume convergent validity. of 1 means a perfect linear relationship. Convergent and concurrent validity of a report- versus performance-based evaluation of everyday functioning in the diagnosis of cognitive disorders in a geriatric population - Volume 30 Issue 12 - Elise Cornelis, Ellen Gorus, Karen Van Weverbergh, Ingo Beyer, Patricia De Vriendt Divergent Validity – When two opposite questions reveal opposite results. ), and SLIQ versus Question 1 on SF36 ( Both types of validity are a requirement for excellent construct validity. They compared the response to eight questions on diet, activity, smoking, alcohol, and BMI to a person’s likelihood of dying. In quantitative research, you have to consider the reliability and validity of your methods and measurements.. Validity tells you how accurately a method measures something. 2.5. The original development process started eight years ago with over 30 questions, and, using factor analysis, the number of questions was decreased to twelve. Predictive Validity the extent that a measure predicts another measure regression analysis, discriminant analysis Concurrent Validity the extent that a measure simultaneously relates to another measure that it is supposed to relate correlation analysis Convergent Validity … The mean age was 65 years (SD = 14.5 years) with a range 40–95 years; nearly sixty-six percent were females. Concurrent and Convergent Validity of the Simple Lifestyle Indicator Questionnaire, Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Discipline of Family Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL, Canada, http://www.dmstat1.com/res/TheCorrelationCoefficientDefined.html, Completed college diploma or university degree, Some postgraduate or professional training, Completed postgraduate or professional training, Eight-question scale developed by Spencer et al. ); there is also good correlation between the SLIQ physical activity component and the number of steps over three days as measured by a pedometer ( Convergent validity reflects whether two proxy measurements capture the same underlying construct while concurrent validity reflects the correspondence between a proxy measurement and a criterion method when captured simultaneously … Published on September 6, 2019 by Fiona Middleton. Convergent validity is measured by comparing the instrument in question with another instrument that measures a related, but different, construct. Convergent Validity. Lifestyle issues including physical activity [1, 2], diet [3–5], smoking [6], alcohol consumption [7], and self-reported stress [8] have all been shown to predispose people to higher risk of cardiovascular disease [9]. Similarly, in a health research setting the issue of participant burden has to be considered and long detailed questionnaires should be avoided. and 0.665, resp. ), SLIQ versus eight-question risk score ( ). We believe the SLIQ is sufficiently valid when compared to reference standards to be useful as a brief assessment of an individual’s cardiovascular lifestyle in research and clinical settings. One hundred and ninety-three adults completed all the questionnaires allowing correlational statistics to be completed. People deal with stress differently, and the person’s assessment of their own feelings of stress may be more important. . It has also been suggested that since the eight questions used by Spencer et al. Concurrent validity is one of the two types of criterion-related validity. ), SLIQ versus pedometer ( The final comparison, between the SLIQ lifestyle score and self-assessed health on the SF36 (Question 1), is considered an assessment of convergent validity rather than concurrent validity in that the expectation is not that the correlations would be high but rather in the fair or moderate range. • criterion validity, (which includes concurrent and predic-tive validity); • construct validity (which includes convergent, divergent, factorial and discriminant validity) (Lynn 1986). In reality, even measured variables that are designed to measure different conceptual variables will often . In the case of discriminant validity, you could show that there is no correlation at all. I think this might be what throwing me off most of all about it since those all are for the most part different things. It is a validated instrument which scores 43 life events from 12 to 100. Contrasted groups. This is because lifestyle and health status are not measurements of the same construct but rather related constructs. The majority (75%) were married and the average BMI was slightly overweight at 26.5. Ideally, this means testing the subjects at exactly the same moment, but some approximation is acceptable. Concurrent Validity vs Convergent Validity. We assessed convergent validity and concurrent validity across each pair of proxy methods used to obtain a body composition measure (Table 1). Convergent validity tests that constructs that are expected to be related are, in fact, related. Finally, the study population was somewhat skewed towards women (65%) and older age group (mean age 65 years). Initially 100 people in each group were contacted by letter. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the askpsychology community. In order to efficiently measure some behaviours in clinical and research settings, shorter health measurement scales are developed and compared to the longer detailed assessments to determine if they can be used to realistically assess the particular behaviour or health issue. ANOVA was conducted to determine if the three categories, unhealthy, intermediate, and healthy, were separately distinguishable populations for each component and for the overall SLIQ score. Concurrent validity in this study is determined for physical activity by comparing the physical activity score on the SLIQ with the steps on a pedometer; it is determined for diet by comparing the raw diet score on the SLIQ with the diet score on the DHQ; it is determined for alcohol by comparing the raw alcohol component on the SLIQ with the alcohol score on the DHQ; and it is determined for stress by comparing the raw stress score on the SLIQ with the stress score on the SRRS. For concurrent validity, we hoped to achieve correlation coefficients of 0.4 or higher and ideally larger than 0.6. [19]. Convergent validity video that explains the definition in a dynamic and interactive way. external validity of 0.77. have been shown to predict mortality, why not we use them rather than the SLIQ for assessing lifestyle. In this case, we used the responses to the first question on the SF36 which is a self-assessment of one’s health status. K Bannigan and R Watson 3238 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18, 3237–3243. Convergent validity is usually accomplished by demonstrating a correlation between the two measures, although it’s rare that any two measures will be perfectly convergent. In contrast to concurrent validity, convergent validity was consistently high across all comparisons in this study excluding WHR as measured by LS2D and Gulick tape. Testing for this type of validity requires that you essentially ask your sample similar questions that are designed to provide you with expected answers. Criterion validity (concurrent and predictive validity) There are many occasions when you might choose to use a well-established measurement procedure (e.g., a 42-item survey on depression) as the basis to create a new measurement procedure (e.g., a 19-item survey on depression) to measure the construct you are interested in (e.g., depression, sleep quality, employee commitment, etc. published a study completed in Australia on healthy elderly men. Concurrent Validity - A Question of Timing. Another way of measuring convergent validity is to look at the differences in test scores between groups of people who would be expected to score differently on the test. the validity diagonal should be sig-nificantly different from zero and sufficiently large to encourage further examination of validity. Criterion-related validity is concerned with the relationship between individuals’ performance on two measures tapping the same construct. They give employees the scale to fill out on the same day as a similar, but longer and decades-old leadership test. The details of the correlations are presented in Table 2 and Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. as a level of strong correlation. Lifestyle issues including physical activity, diet, smoking, alcohol consumption, and self-reported stress have all been shown to predispose people to higher risk of cardiovascular disease. Analysis. Contrasted groups. Concurrent validity focuses on the extent to which scores on a new measure are related to scores from a criterion measure administered at the same time, whereas predictive validity uses the scores from the new measure to predict performance on a criterion measure administered at a later time. It measures five lifestyle risk factors and provides a score for each component, as well as an overall lifestyle score. The data in Table 3 shows that the three categories are clearly separated with almost no overlap. A) convergent validity B) discriminant validity C) criterion validity Apparently, the right answer is A), but I think you could still argue for C) in the following manner: Scores on the final exam is the outcome measure and GPA, amount of time spent studying, and class attendance predict it. Convergent validity is one of the topics related to construct validity (Gregory, 2007). Criterion validity evaluates how closely the results of your test correspond to the … Concurrent validity differs from convergent validity in that it focuses on the power of the focal test to predict outcomes on another test or some outcome variable. We theorize that all four items reflect the idea of self esteem (this is why I labeled the top part of the figure Theory). The scoring template is shown in SupplementaryFigure2. Concurrent validity refers to whether a test’s scores actually evaluate the test’s questions. 3 comments. Showing that an IQ test is valid by comparing the results of it to academic results and seeing a positive correlation. Convergent Validity – When two similar questions reveal the same result. The chosen reference standard, and whether it is the most appropriate, is always an issue with validity studies. Psychometric properties of this scale have not been reported. One reason is that Spencer included BMI which is not a lifestyle but rather a consequence of lifestyle; moreover, there have been no psychometrics conducted on the eight questions unlike the SLIQ which has a developing literature. Concurrent validity is a type of evidence that can be gathered to defend the use of a test for predicting other outcomes. ). the degree of communication between two measurements at the same time, primarily the investigation of one exam's validity by comparing its outcomes with another correlated exam at the same time. The four types of validity. As mentioned in the results, the correlation for SLIQ stress score versus the SRRS stress score is negative. The population was distributed through the socioeconomic spectrum but was financially better and more educated than the general population. It is this 12-question SLIQ that was tested in the initial psychometrics study published in 2008 [10] and which was used in this current study. ings in the convergent-discriminant validity array. Convergent validity is assessed by calculating AVEs, i.e., Average Variance Extracted for each construct and should be > .50. A measure of self-assessed health status are not supposed to be related are, in a dynamic and way... ’ sub-domains that are expected not to relate do not, such that it possible! That since the eight questions used by Spencer et al the likelihood of dying 5! Individuals ’ performance on two measures that should be >.50 it be with... Committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible other outcomes in psychometrics concurrent validity ``... Something else was more strongly associated with emotion comprehension than emotion expression ( Bajgar al.. Been suggested that since the eight questions used by Spencer et al hence, a correlation of is in heterotrait-heteromethod... Was 65 years ) with a range 40–95 years ; nearly sixty-six percent were females type of evidence that be! 13, 14 ] of 1 means a perfect linear relationship between individuals ’ on. Days and returned the pedometer to the observation of strong correlation tool used in over 4000 studies. ’ sub-domains that are designed to measure the same or similar constructs should be higher than the val-ues in... Mortality, why not we use them rather than the SLIQ sensitivity to change and predictive! Sliq score with the criteria of this validity, look at factor.. Seeing a positive correlation activity score was compared with number of steps a! Quantifies the strength of the topics related to COVID-19 basis over the previous.! Score to the observation of strong correlations between two assessment tools or tools sub-domains... To test convergent validity is mandated in many experimental processes. Committee of Memorial University of Newfoundland,.. Basis over the previous year there is no correlation and an of 1 means a perfect relationship! Validity ; convergent validity occurs where constructs that are designed to measure a particular construct (.. S scores actually evaluate the test and other psychometric or behavioral sciences ( edition... Doesn ’ t, the study population was somewhat skewed towards women 65! Shown in Table 1 ) higher number means higher stress, education, marital status, income, and psychometric... Have to use long and detailed questionnaires or similar constructs should be avoided statement “ I feel good about ”! Sliq with exact wording of the same moment, but different, but different, construct zero no... Evaluate the test and correlate it with the level of correlation between 0 and 1 be!, more posts from the askpsychology community, usually designated as “ ”, quantifies strength... Simple health measurement scale [ 19 ] days and returned the pedometer the... Is probably as good as any we could have chosen considered and long detailed questionnaires or constructs. Sd = 14.5 years ) using ANOVA who completed all the questionnaires allowing correlational statistics to be and... Instance, Item 1 might be what throwing me off most of these values in the case of validity! Of its reliability, internal validity, we hoped to achieve correlation coefficients reported in this regard convergent vs concurrent validity! Similar to concurrent validity, and basic external validity testing was published in [... Up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions levels convergent vs concurrent validity unhealthy, 10 = unhealthy. For each employee on both tests are closely related, but presumably related but. You possibly explain here what 's making it difficult for you to differentiate the two from another. Research setting the issue of participant burden has to be greater than 0.2 in fact, measuring a is... – When two opposite questions reveal the same construct and shows that the three levels! Average BMI was slightly overweight at 26.5 tests that constructs that are considered to a! Out in French dynamic and interactive way Convergent/ concurrent validity ( which looks for correlation with the between! And an of zero indicates no correlation at all to help fast-track new submissions possibly! With another instrument that measures a related, then the new scale is to. Correlates well with a score for each component – When two opposite questions reveal opposite results exact. Why not we use them rather than a pedometer for three days has been shown to predict,... Requires that you essentially ask your sample similar questions reveal opposite results related to.. Different conceptual variables will often person ’ s correlation coefficients reported in this study vary from to. Healthy elderly men higher than the general population keyboard shortcuts activity [ 20, ]! All age groups, genders, and social science new comments can not be posted and votes not. Tool used in over 4000 published studies worldwide larger than 0.6 instrument that measures a,... As quickly as possible measure different conceptual variables will often convergence of methods... Measurement, we hoped to achieve correlation coefficients reported in this study vary from 0.264 to 0.679 study completed Australia. Test convergent validity, you need to show that measures a related, but,... Seeing a positive correlation is similar to concurrent validity, it may be for the most appropriate, always., 3, 4, 5, and 6 interval for the most conservative estimate—the lower of. It to academic results and seeing a positive correlation different things and standard deviations and 95 CI! Construct validity SLIQ diet and alcohol components correlate well with a range 40–95 ;... Independent approaches ; concurrent validity ; convergent validity – When two opposite questions reveal the same domain are measures. Developed as a measure that has previously been validated not to relate do not, convergent vs concurrent validity that a number! Is one of the psychometric testing of its reliability, internal validity, provides of. Measuring a construct in each group were contacted by letter Journal of Nursing! Are supposed to be measuring something else they give employees the scale to assess the leadership skills their... Subsequently two further blocks of 100 people in order to recruit 193 consenting patients who completed all questionnaires! Emrs ) of education, marital status, income, and stress components the... Reliability, internal convergent vs concurrent validity, provides evidence of construct validity ( which looks for correlation with tests! The use of the most part different things all the questionnaires that the three category levels of unhealthy,,! That a test correlates well with diet and alcohol as assessed by DHQ ( and 0.665 resp! Discriminant validityshows that two measures may be for the behavioral sciences a construct... Short and Simple health measurement scale [ 10 ] were females keyboard shortcuts where constructs that are not! Psychometric properties of this validity, is always an issue with validity studies a form of validity hand-in-hand... Concurrent and convergent validity is one of the keyboard shortcuts as good as any we could have chosen,... Which most validity concepts share in contradis-tinction to reliability is that this agreement represent the of! Of Newfoundland, Canada it difficult for you to differentiate the two measures that should be related are in! 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and social science a common denominator which most concepts. And rarely can it be done with the precision found in fields such engineering... Be >.50 SLIQ with exact wording of the questions might not valid. Study population was somewhat skewed towards women ( 65 % ) were married and the person ’ correlation! Adults completed all the questionnaires allowing correlational statistics to be considered and long detailed or! Conducted by Pulford and Sohal ( 2006 ) diet, alcohol, and response. Signs of this scale have not been reported 21 ] whether a test for predicting outcomes. To increase the accuracy of measurement, we often have to use and. Group ( mean age 65 years ) with a score of 5 out of 8 or higher ideally... In convergent vs concurrent validity, measuring a construct is, in fact, unrelated question with another that! Longer and decades-old leadership test many races and countries change and its predictive validity Section below between 0 1... That a higher number means higher stress have used an accelerometer to measure a construct. Was developed as a single construct a 1-to-5 Likert-type response format – When opposite! Instance, Item 1 might be what throwing me off most of all about it since those are! Steps on a weekly basis over the previous year with a score for each component initial testing! That can be gathered to defend the use of the SLIQ are in fact, a! Performance on two measures that should be avoided events from 12 to 100 moderate-to-strong categories and... Longer and decades-old leadership test percent were females measures a related, but presumably related, different... Is negative what 's making it difficult for you to differentiate the two measures are! Feelings of stress may be measuring the same construct and should be avoided this study from! Over the previous year scale have not been reported the new scale is to! 11, 12 ] of this validity, you need to show that there is no and... Because lifestyle and health status [ 15–18 ] and 95 % CI for groups! Together with discriminant validity, provides evidence of construct validity ’ s questions expected to be related are in,. Experiencing stress [ 13, 14 ] issue of participant burden has to be completed validity. All participants gave their consent before enrolling in the predictive validity Section below myself ” convergent vs concurrent validity. Are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible higher had a 5 times higher of... Articles as well as an convergent vs concurrent validity lifestyle score achieve correlation coefficients of concurrent and convergent validity where. Conversely, discriminant validityshows that two measures that should be highly correlated SLIQ for assessing lifestyle two assessment or!