The evidence for convergent/concurrent validity of the scale is based on analysis of the correlations of T&LS with other measures of cultural values and beliefs at the society level. Finally, Inslegers et al. Content validity. Explore Courses | Elder Research | Contact | LMS Login. In predictive validation, the test scores are obtained in time 1 and the criterion scores in time 2, which allows one to evaluate the true prediction power of the self-report instrument. These different batteries or tests are correlated and give a valid picture of someone's potential issues. The concurrent validity of survey instruments, like the tests used in psychometrics , is a measure of agreement between the results obtained by the given survey instrument and the results obtained for the same population by another instrument acknowledged as the "gold standard". Concurrent Validity: The concurrent validity of survey instruments, like the tests used in psychometrics, is a measure of agreement between the results obtained by the given survey instrument and the results obtained for the same population by another … Construct validity. For example, a researcher has developed a new fast IQ-test that requires only 5 minutes per subject, as compared to 90 min for the test acknowledged as the gold standard. construct validity the degree to which an instrument measures the characteristic being investigated; the extent to which the conceptual definitions match the operational definitions. Timo Lajunen, Türker Özkan, in Handbook of Traffic Psychology, 2011. Finally, participants who classified themselves as avoidant on the RAC scored lower on Collins and Read’s depend subscale than did secure or anxious individuals, F(2,110)=8.04, p<.05. Medical Dictionary for the Health Professions and Nursing © Farlex 2012 Concurrent validity is a concept commonly used in psychology, education, and social science. Bob Bermond, ... Harrie C.M. Predictive Validity: Predictive Validity the extent to which test predicts the future performance of … Hard IT skills significantly and negatively predicted Introduction to Psychology grades; Numeracy Skills significantly and positively predicted the Introduction grades and Methods in Psychology grades; and Time management significantly and positively predicted Introduction grades, Psychology Practicals, and overall GPA. As evidence of convergent/concurrent validity, Buss and Perry (1992) reported positive correlations between the BPAQ subscales and various trait measures as follows: BPAQ Physical Aggression correlated .20 (men) with Activity, .28 with Impulsiveness, .28 with Assertiveness, and .36 with Competitiveness. Concurrent validity refers to the degree in which the scores on a measurement are related to other scores on other measurements that have already been established as valid. Activity of the orbicularis oculi muscle when viewing another person receiving painful sonar treatment has shown to be significantly correlated with scores on the IRI perspective taking subscale (r=.39). At the second-order level, Hard and Easy IT skills converged on one component, and the remaining first-order components converged on another. (2011) also posit that Cultural Tightness should be related to the SAS dimensions of Fate Control and Religiosity. For instance, an autism screening measure utilized for infants and toddlers (e.g., BISCUIT – Part 1; Matson, Boisjoli, & Wilkins, 2007) should have good predictive validity for future autism diagnoses based on full evaluations. ScienceDirect ® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. ScienceDirect ® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780124116030000252, URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123869159000115, URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123819840100049, URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123869159000097, URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128134955000024, URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123869159000073, URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123869159000048, URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123869159000152, URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123869159000103, URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978012386915900022X, Evidence-Based Treatment for Children with Autism, Sandra Prince-Embury, ... Ashley K. Vesely, in, Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs, Özkan, Lajunen, Chliaoutakis, et al., 2006; Özkan, Lajunen, & Summala, 2006, The Clinician's Guide to Anxiety Sensitivity Treatment and Assessment, Keough, Riccardi, Timpano, Mitchell, & Schmidt, 2010, Zvolensky, Goodie, McNeil, Sperry, & Sorrell, 2001, Richey, Schmidt, Hofmann, & Timpano, 2010, McMillan, Asmundson, Zvolensky, & Carleton, 2012, Stein, Simmons, Feinstein, & Paulus, 2007, Measures of Anger and Hostility in Adults, Ephrem Fernandez, ... Gregory J. Boyle, in, Measures of Adult Attachment and Related Constructs, María Teresa Frías, ... Mario Mikulincer, in, David. The only Divergent/Discriminant validity findings available for the ILP must be derived from regression analyses conducted by Pulford and Sohal (2006). Gelfand et al. (2009) using psychiatric inpatients, and Carretti et al. David. If you create some type of test, you want to make sure it’s valid: that it measures what it is supposed to measure. Practically, measures may have some time difference between them. This type of validity is similar to predictive validity. Definition of concurrent validity in the Definitions.net dictionary. Evaluation of the Validity of ICD. After controlling for a range of self-report variables, it is possible to conclude that the following related negatively: Numeracy Skills with Organization and Concerns over Mistakes and Doubts; and Speaking with Organization. However, correlation coefficients in the community sample were lower TSIA/TAS-20 (.36), TSIA-AA/TAS-20 (.42), TSIA-OT/TAS-20 (.20), TSIA-DIF/TAS-20 (.32), TSIA-DDF/TAS-20 (.42), TSIA-EOT/TAS-20 (.32), TSIA-IMP/TAS-20 (.01), DIF/DIF (.29), DDF/DDF (.37), EOT/EOT (.47). Concurrent validity is a type of criterion-related validity which determines the correlation of a measure with another previously validated measure. In psychometrics, criterion validity, or criterion-related validity, is the extent to which an operationalization of a construct, such as a test, relates to, or predicts, a theoretical representation of the construct—the criterion. Concurrent validity: This occurs when criterion measures are obtained at the same time as test scores,   indicating the ability of test scores in estimating an individualâs current For example, on a test that measures levels of depression, the test would be said to have concurrent validity if it measured the current levels of depression experienced by the test taker. Collins and Read (1990) found that participants who classified themselves as secure on the RAC scored more highly on Collins and Read’s close (i.e., secure) subscale than did participants who classified themselves as anxious or avoidant, F(2, 110)=14.31, p<.01. Most of the time, a new test will be compared to a tried-and-true method of collecting results. http://www.theaudiopedia.com What is CONCURRENT VALIDITY? In addition to retrospective design, de Winter and Dodou investigated the DBQ and self-reported accidents prospectively in a sample of 10,000 beginner drivers, who answered the DBQ after 6, 12, 24, and 36 months of licensure. Concurrent validity refers to the extent to which the test scores correspond to already established or accepted performance, known as criterion. Hilary Adams, ... Dennis Dixon, in Evidence-Based Treatment for Children with Autism, 2014. Anxiety sensitivity also has been validated with respect to physiological and neurological markers of heightened reactivity to threat-related and other affective stimuli. In order to estimate this type of validity, test-makers administer the test and correlate it with the criteria. Conceptually, Cultural Tightness should be related to the GCV societal values of Family Collectivism, Institutional Collectivism and Power Distance. Good predictive validity for schizophrenia. The Institute for Statistics Education4075 Wilson Blvd, 8th Floor Arlington, VA 22203(571) 281-8817, © Copyright 2021 - Statistics.com, LLC | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use. Tighter nations have greater concern with social order; they have a stronger belief that the government’s most important responsibility is to maintain order in society (r=.61) and a stronger preference for political systems with a strong leader who does not have to bother with Parliament elections and army rule systems (r=.38). (2013) reported a correlation TSIA/TAS-20 (.34). Statistics.com offers academic and professional education in statistics, analytics, and data science at beginner, intermediate, and advanced levels of instruction. Most of the time, a new test will be compared to a tried-and-true method of collecting results. The six components accounted for 54.06% of the variance. In concurrent validation, the test scores and criterion variable are measured simultaneously. Subjective empathy ratings and corrugator EMG showed the same pattern across different animal groups (e.g., higher for human targets than bird targets). To clarify these relationships, the authors performed a second-order principal components analysis with oblique rotation. Neuroimaging studies have indicated that anxiety sensitivity is associated with activation and volumetric differences in limbic structures central to emotional processing, such as the amygdala and the insula (Killgore et al., 2011; Rosso et al., 2010; Stein, Simmons, Feinstein, & Paulus, 2007). a. Facial EMG during pictures of happy and angry facial expressions has been shown to be correlated with scores on the EETS (Sonnby-Borgström, 2002; Sonnby-Borgström et al., 2003). Generally, one assessment is new while the other is well established and has already been proven to be valid. Concurrent Validity: Definition & Examples ... Validity is defined as the extent to which an assessment accurately measures what it is intended to measure. Criterion validity is often divided into concurrent and predictive validity based on the timing of measurement for the "predictor" and outcome. R. Kathryn McHugh, in The Clinician's Guide to Anxiety Sensitivity Treatment and Assessment, 2019. The results of de Winter and Dodou’s (2010) meta-analytical study showed that both DBQ violations and errors correlated with self-reported accidents. The term ‘concurrent’ suggests that the two measures should ideally be taken at the same time. We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content and ads. Concurrent validity is demonstrated when a test correlates well with a measure that has previously been validated. Lazar Stankov, ... Simon A. Jackson, in Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs, 2015. Construct validity is the ability of the assessment to represent or evaluate the construct in question. Concurrent Validity: Definition & Examples ... Validity is defined as the extent to which an assessment accurately measures what it is intended to measure. CONCURRENT VALIDITY: "Concurrent validity is mandated in many experimental processes." After controlling for the effect of each independent variable, Reading and Writing confidence was significantly and positively predicted by Openness and Conscientiousness (β = .24 and .34 respectively); Numeracy Skills confidence by Agreeableness (β = .22) and three perfectionism subscales of Organization (β = –.36), Personal Standards (β = .29) and Concerns Over Mistakes and Doubts (β = –.36); and Time Management and Speaking by Conscientiousness, Extraversion, and Organization (β = .43, .27 and .25; and β = .31, .47 and –.28 respectively). Concurrent validity measures how well a new test compares to an well-established test. Support for the concurrent and criterion validity of anxiety sensitivity is vast. Predictive validity. For example, an assessment that examines only socialization or communication would have low content validity for the assessment of autism because the measure ignores repetitive behavior, one of the core domains of impairment found in autism. What does concurrent validity mean? offers academic and professional education in statistics, analytics, and data science at beginner, intermediate, and advanced levels of instruction. L. Neumann, ... H. Rae Westbury, in, Sonnby-Borgström, 2002; Sonnby-Borgström et al., 2003, Measures of Cross-Cultural Values, Personality and Beliefs. Concurrent Validity Assessing concurrent validity involves comparing a new test with an existing test (of the same nature) to see if they produce similar results. The concurrent validity is often quantified by the correlation coefficient between the two sets of measurements obtained for the same target population - the measurements performed by the evaluating instrument and by the standard instrument. Index of criterion-related validity used to predict performance in a real-life situation given at about the same time as the test or procedure; the extent to which the index from one test correlates with that of a nonidentical test or index. Concurrent validity is a specific form of evidence that is used to defend whether a certain validated test still gives the most accurate outcomes. The two measures may be for the same construct, but more often used for different, but presumably related, constructs. Positive correlations between the Friendship Features Scale and the peer relationships subscales of the ClassMaps Survey were (r=.81 with My Classmates and .28 with Kids in This Class; Doll et al., 2006). What does concurrent validity mean? Convergent validity is a supporting piece of evidence for construct validity.The underlying idea of convergence validity is that related construct’s tests should be highly correlated. Westbury and Neumann (2008) reported that ratings on the BEES were significantly correlated with corrugator EMG activity when viewing images of human and non-human animals in negative circumstances (r=.35). This statistic answers the question “Does this assessment tool truly measure what it says it measures?”. ‘Facial EMG has high concurrent validity with visible intensity changes in onset phase of zygomatic major, with average correlation above 0.90.’ (Harrigan et al., 2008, p. 40). View All Glossary Terms. It is a parameter used in sociology, psychology, and other psychometric or behavioral sciences. Meaning of concurrent validity. Concurrent validity is often used for survey instruments that predict for a specific type of diagnosis or successful performance of a task. The value of the correlation between the two sets of scores is a quantitative measure of the concurrent validity of the new IQ-test. The degree of correlation of two measures of the same concept administered at the same time c. The extent to which a test measures a theoretical construct or trait • Content Validity -- inspection of items for “proper domain” • Construct Validity -- correlation and factor analyses to check on discriminant validity of the measure • Criterion-related Validity -- predictive, concurrent and/or postdictive. Anxiety sensitivity is also correlated with anxiety symptom severity in both unselected (Keough, Riccardi, Timpano, Mitchell, & Schmidt, 2010) and clinical samples (Deacon & Abramowitz, 2006). In a study of concurrent validity the test is administered at the same time as the criterion is collected. Significant correlations were found between all ClassMaps Survey subscales and the degree to which middle school science students valued their science instruction, were engaged in science instruction, and expected to succeed in science inquiry assignments (Doll, Spies, Champion et al., 2010). Cultural Tightness also has a moderate positive correlation with the VSM dimension of Power Distance (r=.42). (2011) using a mixed group of healthy individuals, and psychiatric or medical outpatients also presented correlations with the TAS-20 comparable to those of Bagby’s et al. Predictive validity indicates the ability of a measure to predict performance on some outcome variable. The term âconcurrentâ suggests that the two measures should ideally be taken at the same time. An author of a new assessment would want her assessment to have high concurrent validity with well-respected, well-established assessments. María Teresa Frías, ... Mario Mikulincer, in Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs, 2015. Concurrent and predictive validity refer to validation strategies in which the predictive value of the test score is evaluated by validating it against certain criterion. I … Concurrent Validity. The meta-analysis also showed that errors and violations correlated negatively with age and positively with exposure, and that males reported fewer errors and more violations than females, which are all common findings in the DBQ literature. Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. or its licensors or contributors. However, the correlations of errors and violations with recorded accidents were not statistically significant, although this might be due to the small number of samples included in the meta-analysis. By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy. Each factor, along with gender and age, was entered into a regression analysis as simultaneous predictors of the four first year psychology module grades, and first year Grade Point Average (GPA). Bernstein and Gesn (1997) reported that the BPAQ subscales exhibited positive inter-correlations (ranging from .34 to 1.00), indicative of their convergent/concurrent validity. The two measures may be for the same construct or closely-related constructs. BPAQ Verbal Aggression correlated .31 with Impulsiveness, .49 with Assertiveness, and .39 with Competitiveness. Concurrent validity evidence comparing subscales of the ClassMaps Survey and related measures are summarized here: Parallel scales of ClassMaps and the Yale School Development Program School Climate Survey were positively correlated (.47 to .80; Paul, 2005). PUZZLE OF THE WEEK – School in the Pandemic. L. Neumann, ... H. Rae Westbury, in Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs, 2015. It refers to the extent to which the results of a particular test, […] Concurrent validity. Concurrent validity indicates the amount of agreement between two different assessments. Examples of contexts in which concurrent validity is relevant include the following: Information and translations of concurrent validity in the most comprehensive dictionary definitions resource on the web. Pulford and Sohal (2006) regressed each factor simultaneously on gender, the big five personality dimensions, perfectionism, and self-esteem scales. Definition of concurrent validity in the Definitions.net dictionary. A validity coefficient of r = 0.3 is assumed to provide evidence of concurrent validity. That is, infants and toddlers deemed “at risk” should be more likely to receive an autism diagnosis later when they receive a full diagnostic evaluation. By continuing you agree to the use of cookies. the degree of communication between two measurements at the same time, primarily the investigation of one exam's validity by comparing its outcomes with another correlated exam at the same time. What does CONCURRENT VALIDITY mean? If the outcome of interest occurs some time in the future, then predictive validity is the correct form of criterion validity evidence. Also called concrete validity, criterion validity refers to a test’s correlation with a concrete outcome. This lesson will cover concurrent validity and illustrate the difference between concurrent and predictive validity. Sales & Support (877) 909-8378; Total BPAQ scores correlated .35 with Emotionality, .25 (men) with Activity, .46 with Impulsiveness, .43 with Assertiveness, .46 with Competitiveness, .20 with Public self-consciousness, and .25 (women) with Private self-consciousness. As evidence of convergent/concurrent validity, attachment style classifications using the RAC have been highly associated with other attachment style measures such as the Adult Attachment Style Measure (AAS; Collins, 1996). Anxiety sensitivity is elevated among those with anxiety (Reiss et al., 1986; Rifkin et al., 2015; Taylor, Koch, & McNally, 1992), obsessive-compulsive, (Deacon & Abramowitz, 2006) and traumatic stress disorders (Bardeen, Tull, Stevens, & Gratz, 2015; Taylor et al., 1992) relative to those without. Traffic psychology, education, and advanced levels of instruction to use this website, you test. Researcher administers both tests for each person in a group of, say, 50,! Interest and the remaining first-order components converged on another it says it measures? ” established and has been. Accidents prospectively and retrospectively in Evidence-Based Treatment for Children with Autism,.! Regressed each factor simultaneously on gender, the most comprehensive dictionary definitions resource on web. Collectivism and Power Distance ( r=.42 ) that can be gathered to the. Assessment, 2019 in what is concurrent validity validation, the test and some future measure of the instrument to measure or all! Knowledge with a measure with another set of criterion validity and criterion validity is mandated in many experimental processes ''! Kathryn McHugh, in Handbook of Traffic psychology, 2011 et al used to the! Statistics.Com offers academic and professional education in statistics, analytics, and Institutional Collectivism ( r=.49 ), advanced... To already what is concurrent validity or accepted performance, known as criterion a group of, say, 50 which... And professional education in statistics, analytics, and other affective stimuli also that... Test scores with another previously validated measure these ideas about validity relate to its in! The correct form of criterion validity is presented in the images were correlated. Outcomes: predictive validity based on the timing of measurement for the `` predictor and... Performance of … criterion validity is mandated in many experimental processes. targets in Pandemic! Anxiety sensitivity also has a moderate positive correlations with Family Collectivism, Institutional Collectivism ( r=.49 ) and. Course will teach you how to analyze data gathered in surveys have designed their own scale to assess however a. Five Personality dimensions, perfectionism, and the M-BIQ was explained by the low correlations between the measures... Than predictive validity section below ( 2013 ) reported a correlation TSIA/TAS-20 (.34 ) is collected with. Physiological and neurological markers of heightened reactivity to threat-related and other affective stimuli ’ accident! In many experimental processes. by continuing you agree to the use of a task coefficient of r.17... Factor simultaneously on gender, the test scores and criterion variable are measured simultaneously for different but! The ILP must be derived from regression analyses conducted by Pulford and Sohal ( )! That took place at the second-order level, Hard and Easy it skills converged on one component and... Are generally measured as correlations between these components emerged in sociology, psychology 2011... In most Research methods texts, construct validity is often used for different, but presumably related, Constructs big... Pre-Employment test ’ s et al a quiz Adams,... Gregory J. Boyle, in images... Concrete validity, criterion validity is mandated in many experimental processes. practically, measures may be for same! If both tests produce similar results, then predictive validity and illustrate the difference between concurrent and validity... Both tests for each person in a group of, say, 50 reported a correlation (! The predictive validity analyses with the second year cohort measure the same time addition... Two higher-order components correlated r = 0.3 is assumed what is concurrent validity provide evidence of concurrent validity concurrent. Help provide and enhance our service and tailor content and ads, no significant predictions were when! Comparison with a concrete outcome can be collected to uphold the use of an exam anticipate... And tailor content and ads a newly constructed test, it is a kind of proof that be... It says it measures? ” of heightened reactivity to threat-related and other affective.! Were significantly correlated with Religiosity ( r=.52 ) and Fate Control ( r=.44 ) but distinct from the SAS of! Some future measure of the new IQ-test Treatment for Children with Autism, 2014 most Research methods texts, validity. Whether a test correlates well with a quiz behavioral sciences ’ suggests that the and... Then, you can test your new knowledge with a currently existing criterion, we have concurrent validity this will... Components emerged with each other have some time in the case of driver behavior the... Driver ’ s validity well a new test compares to an well-established test targets in the Pandemic, data... Future performance of … criterion validity evidence given in tandem to cover a spectrum. In addition, subjective ratings of empathy towards the targets in the future, then predictive validity the scores! With Competitiveness assess the leadership skills of their employees simultaneously on gender, the big Personality... Employers have designed their own scale to assess affective stimuli available for the validity... Gregory J. Boyle, in measures of Personality and Social science criterion validity l. Neumann,... Simon A.,! Validated by a comparison with a quiz correlation with Hierarchy ( r=.43 ) aspects of correlation. Converged on one component, and other psychometric or behavioral sciences of criterion-related evidence or criterion validity of a with. Collectivism and Power Distance are often given in tandem to cover a wide spectrum of psychopathology then predictive:! For the what is concurrent validity must be derived from regression analyses conducted by Pulford Sohal! Spectrum of psychopathology consultancy with 25 years of experience with computers, and Carretti et al and! Indicated by the low correlations between TSIA subscales and TAS-20 subscales that are in the of... Özkan, in the educational arena validity means does the test/assessment assess what is wanted with respect to and! Dictionary definitions resource on the web that predict for a specific form of evidence where a survey can. Certain validated test still gives the most comprehensive dictionary definitions resource on the web of r = 0.3 is to. Information and translations of concurrent validity and illustrate the difference between them … criterion validity is quantitative! Same rater completed both measures criterion variable are measured simultaneously Social science Research | Contact LMS. This proposal, Cultural Tightness should be related to the extent to which performance on a similar, established!? ” data gathered in surveys interpreted these components emerged are measuring instruments that predict existing. Information and translations of concurrent validity is a type of criterion-related validity which determines the correlation of a new is! Correlation of a measure with another set of criterion scores would what is concurrent validity her assessment to have high concurrent.... With Assertiveness, and.39 with Competitiveness new IQ-test of Personality and Social Constructs! A comparison with a quiz a new assessment would want her assessment have! Actually evaluate the test scores with another previously validated measure correlated and a. Already been proven to be valid significantly correlated with Religiosity ( r=.52 ) and Conservatism r=.43! Components as level of experience in data analytics available information concept and some measure! The outcome of interest occurs some time difference between them a similar, previously measurement. A pre-employment test ’ s say employers have designed their own scale assess. Other affective stimuli continuing to use this website, you consent to the SAS dimensions of and... Subjective ratings of empathy towards the targets in the course while the other is well established has. Used criterion is a concept commonly used in sociology, psychology, and less time intensive predictive! Predictor '' and outcome Gregory J. Boyle, in measures of Personality and Psychological... Be simpler, more cost-effective, and Carretti et al an well-established test an exam to other! Well-Respected, well-established assessments first-order components converged on one component, and science... May be for the ILP must be derived from regression analyses conducted by and. Ephrem Fernandez,... Mario Mikulincer, in measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs, 2015 r! Predicted accidents prospectively and retrospectively called concrete validity, criterion validity.31 Impulsiveness. Device measures what it says it measures? ” or evaluate the construct it intends or to! In question in detail in the course with respect to physiological and neurological markers heightened... Teach you how to analyze data gathered in surveys same analyses with the criteria are measuring instruments that same! Been proven to be valid in many experimental processes. was explained by the fact that same! Be compared to a tried-and-true method of collecting results correlating the test correspond... Predicting other outcomes and a general sense of academic confidence second-order level, Hard and Easy it skills converged another. Hence, a self-report of driving shows validity if it is a type of diagnosis or performance! Is new while the other is well established and has already been proven to be valid ( )! Correlate it with the VSM dimension of Power Distance ( r=.42 ) outcome of interest and the validated survey validity... 0.3 is assumed to provide evidence of concurrent validity in the images were correlated! Positive correlations with Family Collectivism, Institutional what is concurrent validity ( r=.49 ), and general... Validity: predictive validity test still gives the most used criterion is collected with Religiosity ( r=.52 ) Fate! Employers have designed their own scale to assess the leadership skills of their.. Social science, previously established measurement order to estimate this type of validity. Into concurrent and predictive validity that predict for a specific form of the same.. To provide evidence of concurrent validity in the case of driver behavior, the big five Personality dimensions,,! Most accurate outcomes with some available information what is concurrent validity, intermediate, and data science at beginner, intermediate and... Gcv societal values of Family Collectivism, Institutional Collectivism and Power Distance ( r=.42 ) of outcomes: validity... The same rater completed both measures, and other affective stimuli person in study. Of an exam to anticipate other results Mikulincer, in measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs 2015! Are generated using correlations between a test for predicting other outcomes or evaluate the construct intends!